RESUMO
Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (rmTBI, e.g., sports concussions) may be associated with both acute and chronic symptoms and neurological changes. Despite the common occurrence of these injuries, therapeutic strategies are limited. One potentially promising approach is N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) blockade to alleviate the effects of post-injury glutamatergic excitotoxicity. Initial pre-clinical work using the NMDAR antagonist, memantine, suggests that immediate treatment following rmTBI improves a variety of acute outcomes. It remains unclear (1) whether acute memantine treatment has long-term benefits and (2) whether delayed treatment following rmTBI is beneficial, which are both clinically relevant concerns. To test this, animals were subjected to rmTBI via a weight drop model with rotational acceleration (five hits in 5 days) and randomized to memantine treatment immediately, 3 months, or 6 months post-injury, with a treatment duration of one month. Behavioral outcomes were assessed at 1, 4, and 7 months post-injury. Neuropathological outcomes were characterized at 7 months post-injury. We observed chronic changes in behavior (anxiety-like behavior, motor coordination, spatial learning, and memory), as well as neuroinflammation (microglia, astrocytes) and tau phosphorylation (T231). Memantine treatment, either immediately or 6 months post-injury, appears to confer greater rescue of neuroinflammatory changes (microglia) than vehicle or treatment at the 3-month time point. Although memantine is already being prescribed chronically to address persistent symptoms associated with rmTBI, this study represents the first evidence of which we are aware to suggest a small but durable effect of memantine treatment in mild, concussive injuries. This effect suggests that memantine, although potentially beneficial, is insufficient to treat all aspects of rmTBI alone and should be combined with other therapeutic agents in a multi-therapy approach, with attention given to the timing of treatment.
RESUMO
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality with a poorly understood pathophysiology. Animal models have been increasingly utilized to better understand mTBI and recent research has identified visual deficits in these models that correspond to human literature. While visual impairment is being further characterized within TBI, the implications of impaired vision on behavioral tasks commonly utilized in animal models has not been well described thus far. Visual deficits may well confound behavioral tests that are believed to be isolated to cognitive functioning such as learning and memory. We utilized a mouse model of repetitive mTBI (rmTBI) to further characterize visual deficits using an optomotor task, electroretinogram, and visually evoked potential, and located likely areas of damage to the visual pathway. Mice were tested on multiple behavioral metrics, including a touchscreen conditional learning task to better identify the contribution of visual dysfunction to behavioral alterations. We found that rmTBI caused visual dysfunction resulting from damage distal to the retina that likely involves pathology within the optic nerve. Moreover, loss of vision led to poorer performance of rmTBI animals on classic behavioral tests such as the Morris water maze that would otherwise be attributed solely to learning and memory deficits. The touchscreen conditional learning task was able to differentiate rmTBI induced learning and memory dysfunction from visual impairment and is a valuable tool for elucidating subtle changes resulting from TBI.
